I enjoyed reading this recent essay by GetActive CEO Sheeraz Haji in Personal Democracy Forum on his impressions of their 2006 User Conference held earlier this Fall in Washington, DC. I've been to many of these types of events over the years, and think that GetActive does a better-than-average job organizing them. (I'm a former GetActive employee and consultant, and also have several current clients that use GetActive's online services.) As Sheeraz alludes to in his excellent essay, the key is letting go of control, and getting your users (nonprofit customers) to willingly contribute knowledge and best practices to share with others. In this case, the "users" that Sheeraz is referring to are GetActive's nonprofit clients (as opposed to individual "end users.")
My complaint about these types of user conferences is that half the sessions are so "vendor-centric" that the best practices make no sense outside of that specific vendor's framework. This has sometimes been called "vendor lock-in," whereby organizations are making huge leaps in learning about online fundraising or email messaging, but they can't take it with them to another vendor because all the learning is based on a specific user interface, or specific tool features. My other complaint about user conferences is the feeling that "end users" (email list subscribers, online donors, real-world activists) are treated as nothing more than metrics. In fact, "end users" aren't invited to user conferences at all, and have become statistical abstractions at best.
Having said that, I think the "end user" is making a comeback in the emergence of the social Web (MySpace, blogs, etc.). If you want to see an example of letting go of control, try launching your content into the blogsphere or MySpace. The average blogger will reshape your campaign message into something you barely recognize (but hopefully include the all-important hypertext link). One hundred MySpace friends will link to your campaign landing page, but watch your logo get morphed into bizarre contortions by late night Photoshoppers.
The social Web trend speaks to the need for more focus not just on the "vendor's user" (the nonprofit), but on the "end user" (the individual donor and activist). The end user (that's you and me) could (and should) care less about whether a nonprofit's website or email is powered by GetActive or Kintera. The end user enjoys receiving emails that are easy to read, easy to forward, easy to donate with, easy to send messages to decisionmakers with, easy to link to from their blog or Facebook page, easy to cut and paste.
This shift requires the vendors to think differently about who the end user really is. To their credit, both GetActive and Convio announced in October and November respectively that they're deploying new tools that allow their customers to interface more seamlessly with users on social networks. ChipIn has an online fundraising widget that can easily be added by anyone to their blog or their social network page. Greenpeace International's new "open source" whale campaign invites everyone around the world to participate in planning their upcoming campaign to end the south sea sanctuary whale hunt in the waters off Antarctica. You can read through several hundred submitted ideas, submit your own, and vote for the ones you think are best.